Council Members Raise Questions After Leland Street Restricted in Bethesda

Resident in area says discontinued trade feels like ‘Sunday morning, each morning’

The cosmetic bollards restraint entrance to Leland Street from Woodmont Avenue

The cosmetic bollards restraint entrance to Leland Street from Woodmont Avenue

Andrew Metcalf

Two Montgomery County Council members are doubt a county Department of Transportation preference to retard entrance to Leland Street subsequent to downtown Bethesda.

Council President Roger Berliner, in a minute sent Monday to a department’s director, Al Roshdieh, requested some-more information about because a preference was done to implement bollards during a finish of July. The bollards retard vehicles from branch right from Woodmont Avenue onto Leland Street.

“I have been a clever disciple for singular entrance restrictions where such restrictions have proven to be compulsory by trade evaluations,” Berliner wrote. “However, we am not wakeful of other instances in that an whole line has been sealed to a public.”

Berliner also asked either a dialect sought broader submit from a ubiquitous open before restraint entrance to a street.

Esther Bowring, a mouthpiece for a travel department, pronounced final week that it blocked entrance to a travel after residents’ voiced concerns about cut-through traffic. On Thursday, she sent Bethesda Beat a copy of a study a dialect conducted before it blocked entrance to a road.

Previously, a pointer on Woodmont Avenue taboo right turns onto Woodmont from 4 to 7 p.m. on weekdays. Bowring pronounced that when a dialect monitored a highway on Oct. 20, 2015, workers celebrated 101 violations. Then, on Oct. 6, 2016, they found 155 violations.

Bowring pronounced a Sacks Neighborhood, where Leland is, “had long-standing cut-through trade concerns.”

Council member Hans Riemer pronounced final week that restraint Leland Street seems to protest a council’s vigilant when it personal that widen as a teenager arterial highway when it authorized a Bethesda Downtown Sector Plan.

He pronounced a legislature concluded to adopt that highway as one “that serves a Bethesda downtown.”

“I consider we need to speak to DOT about how they would see this as being unchanging with that,” Riemer said.

Bowring pronounced DOT relied on a 1994 executive regulation that allows a group to supplement an entrance limitation to a travel if a area is endangered about poignant trade and petitions a group for a restriction.

The law notes, “Approval of a due entrance limitation devise by [DOT] contingency be formed on a visualisation that a advantages of a devise to residents of a specific area or streets lonesome by a devise transcend a intensity impacts to a surrounding community, arterial/major highway network, and open comforts or other destinations.”

The law also calls for a village comment routine that includes notifying circuitously adults associations and holding a open conference within 60 days after DOT recommends a final plan—notice of that “must be published dual uninterrupted weeks in a journal of ubiquitous dissemination in a county.”

It’s not transparent if those procedures were followed in this case. Bowring did not respond to an email sent Monday afternoon seeking if a open conference took place.

When Bethesda Beat posted a story on Aug. 8 about a new limitation to Leland Street, some-more than 100 people commented. Most against a move. Many commenters pronounced a highway was used to get from downtown Bethesda to Bradley Boulevard and over while also avoiding mostly undiluted roads such as Arlington Road, Wisconsin Avenue and Bethesda Avenue.

Ellen Rader, a Leland Street proprietor given 1985, welcomed a change.

“I’ve lived for so long, I’ve seen an boost in trade over a years,” Rader pronounced Monday. “Sometimes it’s tough to get out of a driveway.”

She remarkable that a builder of a Crescent Plaza building paid for a walking islands in a street, that assistance ease traffic. Neighbors were endangered a Woodmont Avenue building opposite from a Leland intersection would means trade problems on their travel when it was built.

She pronounced a county does not say a islands and instead residents in a area are obliged for them.

She combined that a entrance limitation has significantly reduced trade on a street.

“I feel like it’s Sunday morning, each morning,” Rader said. “It’s really quiet.”

She also pronounced that a infancy of residents in a area sealed a petition seeking for a restriction, as compulsory and that she believes trade was usually going to get worse.

“We know what a conditions is now and we know it hasn’t gotten improved over a years,” Rader said.

More tabs ...

Posted in
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
short link