Friedson Maintains Fundraising Lead in Race for Bethesda-Based District 1 County Council Seat

In Rockville-based District 3, obligatory legislature member Sidney Katz has large income advantage over pretender on-going competition Ben Shnider

Top fundraisers in a County Council District 1 competition were Andrew Friedson, tip left, Pete Fosselman, Meredith Wellington and Reggie Oldak

Top fundraisers in a County Council District 1 competition were Andrew Friedson, tip left, Pete Fosselman, Meredith Wellington and Reggie Oldak

Provided photos

Andrew Friedson, a former confidant to state Comptroller Peter Franchot, has confirmed his fundraising lead in a District 1 Montgomery County Council competition and has some-more than double a debate income of his closest competitor, according to financial avowal reports.

Friedson reported carrying $245,300 in income on palm in a latest debate financial news filed with a state Board of Elections by a deadline Tuesday night. Friedson is regulating opposite former Kensington Mayor Pete Fosselman, former county Planning Board member Meredith Wellington, state Del. Ana Sol Gutierrez (D-Chevy Chase), taxation profession Reggie Oldak, advantages veteran Jim McGee, tiny business owners Bill Cook and amicable workman Dalbin Osorio in a Jun 26 Democratic primary.

Fosselman reported a second-most debate income with about $114,300. Wellington was third with $77,800, followed by Oldak with $65,800 and Gutierrez with $56,350. McGee reported carrying lifted $7,900; Osorio, $3,550; and Cook, $2,000.

The usually Republican who filed to run in a competition is college tyro Richard Banach, who didn’t record an updated fundraising news progressing this month as compulsory by a state. He pronounced during a Mar candidates’ forum he was regulating to benefit domestic experience. As a result, a Democratic primary will expected establish who represents District 1 on a legislature for a subsequent 4 years.

[Related – Bethesda Beat Election Guide for District 1]

Roger Berliner, a obligatory District 1 legislature member, is regulating for county executive.

Friedson and Wellington both spent a small over $60,000 on their campaigns from mid-January by mid-May, while Oldak spent somewhat some-more than $50,000. Fosselman spent about $20,500 over a past 4 months, while McGee spent $6,000 and Gutierrez usually $2,000.

Friedson, Wellington and Fosselman are regulating normal debate financing and are means to accept particular contributions adult to $6,000 each. Wellington bolstered her debate comment in Jun and Jan with $66,000 in personal loans. Fosselman and his husband, Duane Rollins, loaned his debate about $10,800 in January, while Friedson loaned his debate about $1,750.

Oldak and Gutierrez are a usually dual possibilities who have competent to accept supports by a county’s open debate financing system. District legislature possibilities regulating a complement contingency lift during slightest $10,000 in particular contributions of $150 or reduction from during slightest 125 county residents. Those contributions are afterwards matched with multiples of open funds.

Oldak has already perceived $125,000 in open funds—the extent a district legislature claimant can receive. She can continue to lift contributions of $150 or less, though those won’t be matched with county funds, that boundary her ability to supplement some-more income to her debate comment during a final stretch.

Gutierrez has perceived $35,350 in open supports so far, according to her latest debate financial report.

On May 15, McGee requested about $36,500 in open supports after stating that his debate perceived $10,900 in authorised contributions. However, a state house needs to examination a ask before a supports are disbursed, that typically happens within 10 days.

Cook and Osorio, who both designed to use a open financing system, unsuccessful to accommodate a threshold mandate before a May 15 filing deadline and therefore are no longer authorised to request for relating open supports for a primary contest.

 

Katz now has scarcely double a debate income as challenger Shnider

District 3 possibilities Sidney Katz, left, and Ben Shnider

Incumbent District 3 legislature member Sidney Katz appears prepared to outspend his pretender on-going challenger Ben Shnider in a final month of a Democratic primary debate for a legislature chair representing Gaithersburg and Rockville.

Shnider, who had $112,100 in debate income during a commencement of January, spent about $103,400 from Jan by mid-May and lifted about $42,050 during that time. That left him with usually underneath $51,000 in his debate account. Shnider is regulating normal debate financing.

Meanwhile, during that time, Katz spent $33,810 and continued to accept relating supports by a county’s open debate financing system, withdrawal him with $106,500 streamer into a final month before a primary. So far, Katz has perceived about $110,700 in open supports and requested a final $14,300 to strike a $125,000 extent for district legislature candidates.

No Republicans filed to run for a District 3 seat.

Shnider, 29, a former domestic executive for J Street, has worked to position himself as a some-more on-going choice when compared to Katz, 68, who served as Gaithersburg mayor for 18 years before being inaugurated to his initial tenure on a legislature in 2014. Katz has cited his new opinion to boost a smallest salary to $15 per hour and his support for concept prekindergarten as reasons because electorate should support him. Shnider has pronounced a stream legislature has failed to assuage trade issues and he would like to enhance rail use and train fast movement in a county.

[Related – Bethesda Beat Election Guide for District 3]

More tabs ...

Posted in
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
short link tablet123.com/?p=6088.