“Galaxy S8 or iPhone 8?”
It is a doubt on a lips of millions of smartphone buyers, yet a existence is “Galaxy S8 or iPhone 7?” will be a conflict for a infancy of 2017. So does have what it takes to contest with Samsung’s subsequent era device and that is a best upgrade? Let’s take a look…
Displays – Samsung’s Big Win
Comparing 2016 and 2017 smartphones customarily formula in a large win in during slightest one difficulty for a newer indication and for a Galaxy S8 it is a display:
- Galaxy S8 – 5.8-inch Super AMOLED, 2960 x 1440 pixels (570 ppi pixel density), 83.6% screen-to-body ratio, Corning Gorilla Glass 5
- iPhone 7 – 4.7-inch LED-backlit IPS LCD, 1334 x 750 pixels (326 ppi), 65.6% screen-to-body ratio
Quite honestly Samsung’s new OLED ‘Infinity Display’ is in a opposite joining to a iPhone 7’s ageing LCD Retina Display. Not usually is it roughly 20% larger, it is brighter, crook and – as a initial Mobile HDR accredited mobile shade – it offers dramatically softened contrast.
If there is a downside to a Infinity Display, it is that Samsung was forced to revoke a default fortitude to 2220 x 1080 to save battery life (more later) – yet this is still distant aloft than a iPhone 7’s honestly old-fashioned 1334 x 750 pixels and it can be cranked behind adult if we prefer.
Winner: Galaxy S8 – Samsung’s vastly aloft arrangement has this difficulty in a bag.
Design – Smartphone Future Vs Smartphone Past
The iPhone will explain some important victories in after categories, yet pattern is another large win for a Galaxy S8. Quite simply it’s like looking during Smartphone Future Vs Smartphone Past.
- Galaxy S8 – 148.9 x 68.1 x 8.0 mm (5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31-inch), 155g (5.36 oz)
- iPhone 7 – 138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 in) and 138 g (4.87 oz)
The celebrated thing Samsung has achieved here is a 20% incomparable shade distance for usually a 12% boost in weight. In fact a Galaxy S8 even has a 5% incomparable arrangement than a iPhone 7 Plus nonetheless it weighs over 20% less. This is condensation taken to a whole new level.
But this win isn’t all about numbers, a Galaxy S8 is also some-more ergonomic. It’s winding edges and elongated 18.5:9 aspect ratio (vs 16:9 in a iPhone 7) make it feel good in palm and keeps it serviceable one handed. There’s also a combined reward of support for microSD expandable storage and Samsung has still managed to fist in a 3.5mm jack and facial/iris scanner (more in a Performance section).
Where a iPhone 7 does strike behind is a some-more durable aluminium behind and while a fingerprint reader consumes distant too most space, it isn’t ludicrously positioned beside a behind camera like a Galaxy S8 where it is tough to strech and frequently causes we to blemish a camera lens.
Both phones are IP68 H2O and dirt resistant, that is honestly standard for a march these days, yet it’s unfit to get divided from how distant Samsung has pulled forward of Apple in altogether pattern innovation. The fact a iPhone 8 is expected to copy many of a Galaxy S8’s traits (glass back, probably bezel-less design) usually proves this.
Winner: Galaxy S8 – Apple has stood still for too prolonged and Samsung’s pattern is simply in a opposite class
Performance – Samsung’s Self Inflicted Failure
Samsung might simply win a initial dual categories, yet it is Apple’s iPhone 7 that is a vastly softened performer since Samsung simply can't stop self-sabotaging a phones.
Quite simply a iPhone 7 delivers a most faster and vastly smoother program knowledge compared to a Galaxy S8. Apple has always been good during optimising a hardware and program and a fact a Galaxy S8 can’t reason a candle even to a era comparison Pixel XL shows where Samsung continues to go wrong.
Android on a Samsung phone also means old-fashioned program (the Galaxy S8 ships with Android 7.0 when Android 7.1 is 7 months old) and unconstrained duplication: dual app stores, dual calculators, dual web browsers, dual mobile remuneration services, dual clocks, etc. And a newest addition: personal partner Bixby is usually a bad knock-off of Google Assistant with a dedicated (and locked) earthy Bixby button. Pointless.
Yes, iOS might have gotten some-more magisterial over a years yet there is no duplication and it hasn’t influenced performance. Stock Android on a Pixel shows Google has a core height to contest with iOS, yet Samsung has no seductiveness in delivering it in a optimised form.
As such a specifications of a dual smartphones are eventually rather pointless:
- Galaxy S8 (US) – Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 octa-core chipset (4x 2.35GHz and 4x 1.9GHz Kryo CPUs), Adreno 540 GPU; 4GB of RAM
- Galaxy S8 (Europe and Asia) – Exynos 8895 (4x 2.3 GHz 4x 1.7 GHz CPUs), ARM Mali-G71 MP20 GPU; 4GB of RAM
- iPhone 7 – Apple A10 Fusion chipset: Quad Core CPU (2.34 GHz – 2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr), Six Core PowerVR Series7XT Plus GPU, 2GB of RAM
Elsewhere we will find a integrate of connectivity advantages to a Galaxy S8 such as Bluetooth 5.0 (2x speed, 4x operation of Bluetooth 4.2) and LTE (4G) speeds adult to one gigabit, yet these are doubtful to broach genuine universe advantages while third celebration appendage makers and carriers locate up.
Winner: iPhone 7 – Apple continues to win this conflict with palliate and until Samsung rethinks a self portion proceed to Android there is no pointer of that changing
Cameras – Samsung Leads But Stagnates
There is a new smartphone camera champion in city and it isn’t done by Apple or Samsung. The Google Pixel took a climax in 2016 and conjunction a iPhone 7 nor Galaxy S8 can adopt it, yet in a head-to-head between these giants it is a Galaxy S8 that simply comes out on top.
Both phones have problems with colours. The Galaxy S8 has a bent to oversaturate while a iPhone 7 washes out a lot of shots. The latter is infrequently praised for being some-more ‘accurate’ yet that’s not what we found – there are distant too many greys (particularly in dim areas) for that to be a case. The Galaxy S8 delivers some-more fact as well, yet a Pixel is a yardstick a other dual need to beat.
Where a Galaxy S8 camera unequivocally stands out opposite a iPhone 7, however, is low light. Apple has been lagging behind here for several generations and it stays an area a association contingency residence with a iPhone 8, if Google isn’t to pierce even serve forward with a Pixel 2 that will be announced around a same time (Sept/Oct).
It’s a identical box with selfies. The Galaxy S8’s front camera has an 8MP sensor and f/1.7 orifice contra a iPhone 7’s 5MP, f/2.2 combo. Neither phone nails this difficulty yet again Samsung takes a crook some-more clear shots and a Snapchat-style filters might be a blatant fraud yet they will expected infer a large hit.
As for video, it’s closer with both phones indeed holding softened video than a Pixel (Google’s diseased mark – quite in low light) and while we cite a Galaxy S8’s brighter formula we doubt owners will be unfortunate with possibly indication here.
Elsewhere Samsung also delivers a celebration trick: iris and facial recognition.
The latter is simply fooled by a photograph, so skip it yet a former has a intensity to reinstate a fingerprint scanner – during slightest on paper. In reality, however, it’s simply too unsuitable to use frequently (it can onslaught in unequivocally splendid and unequivocally low light and if you’re wearing sunglasses) and it is distant some-more celebrated carrying to clear your phone by looking during it.
Some will no doubt adore iris approval as it feels rather enchanting when it works, yet for me both technologies stays too unsuitable and it creates a Galaxy S8’s absurd fingerprint sensor position all a some-more frustrating.
Winner: Galaxy S8 – The Galaxy S7 already had a softened camera than a iPhone 7, so it is no warn a Galaxy S8 extends this lead. Apple will demeanour to tighten a opening with a iPhone 8, yet a genuine hazard is visitor Google who could competition forward of them both with a Pixel 2
Battery Life – Stagnation Meets Regression
Samsung is a bizarre association when it comes to smartphone battery life. The Galaxy S5 was a difficulty leader, a Galaxy S6 an embarrassment, a Galaxy S7 a lapse to form and now a Galaxy S8 takes another step behind – yet it still edges out Apple’s perennially unsatisfactory proceed to a 4.7-inch iPhone.
In short: both a Galaxy S8 and iPhone 7 won’t get users by a full day with complicated usage.
What does a repairs for Samsung is a multiple of a significantly incomparable arrangement (still a biggest energy pull on a phone) with no boost in battery from a Galaxy S7 (3000 mAh). For a iPhone 7 it’s years of neglect. Apple delivers difficulty heading battery life with a iPhone Plus models yet a smaller iPhone has been under-served for years and, for all a potency of iOS, that will continue until Apple fits a bigger battery.
Where Samsung does have a large lead, however, is charging. The Galaxy S8 can go from 0-50% in underneath 20 mins and broach a full assign in small over an hour. By contrariety a iPhone 7 trudges along holding twice as prolonged to get to both points and even regulating a aloft energy iPad horse creates small difference.
In fact a Galaxy S8 wirelessly charges faster than a iPhone 7’s connected charging. That’s usually embarrassing.
Another Samsung and indicate is new mania with battery safety. Following a Galaxy Note 7 disturbance it has introduced a difficulty heading ‘8 Point Quality Check’ (it is value observant Apple has a own battery problems) and incomparable cycle longevity means a Galaxy S8 will remove usually 5% ability after one year when rivals typically dump 15-20%.
Samsung has also changed a Galaxy S8 to USB Type-C charging, something Apple unequivocally should do if a going to insist on stuffing a MacBooks with Type-C ports and no Lighting.
Winner: Galaxy S8 – Samsung has regressed, yet Apple’s refusal to fit significantly incomparable batteries in it’s 4.7-inch models and residence basis like quick charging meant this detriment was inevitable.
Price And Storage – More For More
So how most are we going to compensate for these phones? In short, a lot:
- Galaxy S8 – 64GB – $750 / €799 / £689
- iPhone 7 – 32GB ($649), 128GB ($749) and 256GB ($849)
The title here is Samsung’s $100 strike compared to a launch cost of a Galaxy S7. As such, while Samsung has doubled a 32GB of a predecessor, a Galaxy S8 is underneath genuine vigour from a iPhone 7’s 128GB cost point.
The flip side is a Galaxy S8 is expandable so we can always supplement some-more storage if we need it, and you’ll also get a span of AKG headphones bundled that Samsung values during $100. Those who already possess reward headphones would no doubt have rather had income off a seeking cost instead, yet any perceptive audio listener knows they have to ascent Apple’s awful bundled earphones ASAP.
Winner: A Draw – Samsung’s cost rises make it some-more costly than a iPhone for a initial time, yet watch out for poignant discounts in a entrance months
Bottom Line – Who Dares Wins
Samsung phones are never going to be perfect. The company’s mania with unnecessary Android customisation, app duplication, bloatware and delayed program updates ensures that – and there’s no pointer of this changing anytime soon.
By contrariety Samsung’s biggest debility is Apple’s biggest strength. The iPhone 7 is though counterpart when it comes to a lean, fast, sharp program experience.
But Apple needs this since in each other area a Galaxy S8 creates a iPhone 7 demeanour like a dinosaur. Its design, arrangement and battery charging are in another joining and a camera extends a lead a Galaxy S7 already had. Granted a Galaxy S8 has an absurdly positioned fingerprint sensor, yet that’s about a usually hardware misstep.
As such a preference comes down to priorities. If it’s program we should buy a iPhone 7, it’s a large reason yet also a only reason. For all else a Galaxy S8 capitalises on Apple’s miss of adventurous in new years. That might change with an all-new iPhone 8 after this year, yet while that stays conjecture a elementary fact is companies who dare, win.
More On Forbes