Authors formerly certified that blunder in calculations overestimated intensity pursuit losses
The cover page for a investigate combined by PFM for Montgomery County on a mercantile impact of a $15 smallest wage
Updated – 8:40 p.m. – Montgomery County will not compensate $149,000 to a Philadelphia-based consulting and investigate association for a now discredited investigate on a internal mercantile impact of lifting a smallest salary to $15 per hour.
Patrick Lacefield, a orator for County Executive Ike Leggett, wrote in an email to Bethesda Beat Tuesday, “We are not profitable a bill.”
The county also does not wish Public Financial Management (PFM) to control any additional work on a cryptic report, Lacefield wrote. He did not respond to email and phone messages on Tuesday and Wednesday seeking for serve comment.
A orator for PFM pronounced Wednesday dusk a organisation will relinquish a price for a report.
“PFM is unapproachable to have served a county for many years,” Kirk Dorn, a spokesman, wrote in an email. “In support of efforts to strech a certain fortitude to a county’s smallest salary issues, we have motionless to relinquish a price for a work and that of a subconsultant who worked on a mercantile impact apportionment of a study. We will continue to be as useful as possible.”
The pierce comes after Council member George Leventhal publicly asked Monday during a legislature cabinet assembly either a county could “recoup” what a organisation charged a county for a report.
Leventhal pronounced he was sensitive by Lacefield a county wouldn’t be profitable for a study.
“I don’t consider a county was going to get a money’s worth,” Leventhal pronounced Tuesday. “I’m blissful to hear we haven’t paid and we won’t pay.”
The legislature is deliberation legislation to lift a smallest salary to $15 per hour. Leggett consecrated a investigate after vetoing a check that a legislature narrowly passed. The check would have lifted a smallest salary for many businesses in a county to $15 per hour by 2020. Leggett pronounced he wanted to investigate a mercantile impact to a county of lifting a salary to $15, so he consecrated a report.
In August, a news was widely criticized for relying heavily on surveys of business owners after it was released. Critics pronounced business owners have a financial inducement to contend that lifting a salary would lead them to cut jobs, even if that wasn’t what would happen.
As recoil opposite a investigate mounted, PFM Managing Director Dean Kaplan admitted there was an blunder in a study—the organisation used a wrong information from a surveys of business owners. He pronounced a strange guess that 47,000 jobs in a county would be mislaid by 2022 if a salary were increasing to $15 per hour expected would be cut in half once a blunder was corrected.
It was unclear this week if PFM had given a county a corrected chronicle of a work yet, dual months after a blunder was acknowledged.